sarcasticsquirrel: (me animated)
i am naked in the willamette week. this is what i get for having to sign over the rights to my modeling photos to the photographers...

Date: 2007-06-30 02:46 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile]
doh. Is that the massage guy's doing?

Date: 2007-06-30 05:00 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile]
Grrr I hate that. A photographer I worked with a year ago uses a couple photos of mine for ads on myspace. It's annoying and I was confused first time I looked up and saw my self looking back.

This might not help how you feel but you can look at it as free publicity and be proud of your cute behind being in there.

Date: 2007-06-30 06:08 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile]
How did that happen? Is it an article or some ad? Yuck, that sucks.

Date: 2007-06-30 08:53 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile]
Damn. j00 b33n IPwned.
If it makes you feel any better, this happens not only to models, but to authors, journalists, and researchers too.

On an unrelated note, I didn't know they would do nudity in the WillyWeek.

Date: 2007-06-30 10:47 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile]
That's balls. Hope nothing bad comes of it.

(He said, away from the judgmental hoards. I friended you, btw.)

Date: 2007-07-01 03:52 am (UTC)From: [identity profile]
I have never heard of the willamette week.

Date: 2007-07-02 06:22 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile]
mmph. lame. even if they're within their rights, they couldn't talk to you about it? it's not, like, a niche publication, it's the willamette week. my parents read it too.


sarcasticsquirrel: (Default)
sarcastic squirrel

January 2017

8 91011121314

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 22nd, 2017 10:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios