> Or maybe I just got tired of you sitting there pretty much going "nuh-uh!!" to > all of the statements I've made, you sociopathic fucking festering human > pustule.
Wow, a sentence beginning with 'Or'. This is such good form. You need a comma before your direct quote. I'll take an aside right now to point out that going, 'Nuh-uh!' to an entire battery of statements is, in fact, the most likely reaction for anyone to have when all of those statements are, in fact, false.
> Or maybe I don't want to get my friends involved in it even more, since I know > you're an attention-seeking pseudo-self-injuring teenage angst-whore at...what > are you now, 22? How fucking sad.
Well, I'll be damned! This sentence it actually grammatically sound. The only suggestion I have is leaving a space after the ellipsis.
> The most convincing part of the entire statement was the fact that he had no idea > about any of the drama that had ocurred. None. He just thought you were "some girl > I got in a fight with on Livejournal" and he thought I would get a kick out of > hearing about your nasty diseased cunt and your "floppy bologna titties" and how > you gave up- even DEMANDED- anal on the first date.
I think the punctuation you were looking for was a pair of emdashes, not hyphens. At this point, though, it should be simply underscored that anyone who is going to say that sort of thing about her is going to say that sort of thing about her. Anyone who is not going to, won't. Consider: If Ashley had in fact demanded anal sex on a first date (not that that would be any of your business, actually, or reflect badly on her--your hangups are not the be-all-end-all of human morals) and this person was still her friend, you wouldn't have heard jack shit about it, unless it was in a context of praise.
Really, ask yourself, how likely is it that you just happened to stumble across that one person who is so rare a combination as to have no qualms about rumourmongering and sharing private matters about a person with someone they are in conflict with behind her back, but (oh no!) not lie, exaggerate, or fabricate a single bit of their story!
Get a clue.
The quotes around 'some girl...LiveJournal' are unnecessary, and the 'J' in 'LiveJournal' is capitalised.
> You nasty little piece of shit. *I* have never had an STD. And I wish you'd keep > your cunt out of my life and the lives of my friends. And I don't really want to > talk to you anymore. Even your journal feels dirty... especially with all its > Hot Topic splendor. Grow up, whore.
Sentences should not begin with 'And'. The first sentence up there is a blatant sentence fragment. As for logical fallacies, whether or not you have ever had an STD is in no way any indicator that Ashley has had one. Her tests are also not indicators of such fact. Moreover, you have made claim that your friend has an STD. Does that make him disgusting? Is your friend's penis a filth-ridden shaft of decaying swill that automatically catapults him to the position of being a bastion of pure evil? If not, keep your accusations straight.
One of my best friends is an HIV patient. He's one of the kindest and most intelligent men I've ever met. He has a flair for showmanship and congeniality no straight man could ever match. And, from what he's said, back in the 80s when he was clean and active sexually, he often insisted on anal the first time he had someone fuck him. Somehow that just doesn't make him very evil in my book. Your mileage may vary, especially if you're a homophobic Bush-praising moralist.
Ashley doesn't have any STDs, but if she did it would not, in fact, make her evil.
I'd continue with the additional logical fallacy that your claim to not want to talk to her anymore is utterly unfounded, as you were, in fact, the one who pursues her into her own journal in order to talk shit about her, but the fact that trolls like you thrive on such attention is far too self-evident.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
chiming
no subject
Date: 2005-11-24 10:05 am (UTC)From:> all of the statements I've made, you sociopathic fucking festering human
> pustule.
Wow, a sentence beginning with 'Or'. This is such good form. You need a comma before your direct quote. I'll take an aside right now to point out that going, 'Nuh-uh!' to an entire battery of statements is, in fact, the most likely reaction for anyone to have when all of those statements are, in fact, false.
> Or maybe I don't want to get my friends involved in it even more, since I know
> you're an attention-seeking pseudo-self-injuring teenage angst-whore at...what
> are you now, 22? How fucking sad.
Well, I'll be damned! This sentence it actually grammatically sound. The only suggestion I have is leaving a space after the ellipsis.
> The most convincing part of the entire statement was the fact that he had no idea
> about any of the drama that had ocurred. None. He just thought you were "some girl
> I got in a fight with on Livejournal" and he thought I would get a kick out of
> hearing about your nasty diseased cunt and your "floppy bologna titties" and how
> you gave up- even DEMANDED- anal on the first date.
I think the punctuation you were looking for was a pair of emdashes, not hyphens. At this point, though, it should be simply underscored that anyone who is going to say that sort of thing about her is going to say that sort of thing about her. Anyone who is not going to, won't. Consider: If Ashley had in fact demanded anal sex on a first date (not that that would be any of your business, actually, or reflect badly on her--your hangups are not the be-all-end-all of human morals) and this person was still her friend, you wouldn't have heard jack shit about it, unless it was in a context of praise.
Really, ask yourself, how likely is it that you just happened to stumble across that one person who is so rare a combination as to have no qualms about rumourmongering and sharing private matters about a person with someone they are in conflict with behind her back, but (oh no!) not lie, exaggerate, or fabricate a single bit of their story!
Get a clue.
The quotes around 'some girl...LiveJournal' are unnecessary, and the 'J' in 'LiveJournal' is capitalised.
> You nasty little piece of shit. *I* have never had an STD. And I wish you'd keep
> your cunt out of my life and the lives of my friends. And I don't really want to
> talk to you anymore. Even your journal feels dirty... especially with all its
> Hot Topic splendor. Grow up, whore.
Sentences should not begin with 'And'. The first sentence up there is a blatant sentence fragment. As for logical fallacies, whether or not you have ever had an STD is in no way any indicator that Ashley has had one. Her tests are also not indicators of such fact. Moreover, you have made claim that your friend has an STD. Does that make him disgusting? Is your friend's penis a filth-ridden shaft of decaying swill that automatically catapults him to the position of being a bastion of pure evil? If not, keep your accusations straight.
One of my best friends is an HIV patient. He's one of the kindest and most intelligent men I've ever met. He has a flair for showmanship and congeniality no straight man could ever match. And, from what he's said, back in the 80s when he was clean and active sexually, he often insisted on anal the first time he had someone fuck him. Somehow that just doesn't make him very evil in my book. Your mileage may vary, especially if you're a homophobic Bush-praising moralist.
Ashley doesn't have any STDs, but if she did it would not, in fact, make her evil.
I'd continue with the additional logical fallacy that your claim to not want to talk to her anymore is utterly unfounded, as you were, in fact, the one who pursues her into her own journal in order to talk shit about her, but the fact that trolls like you thrive on such attention is far too self-evident.